GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs. Radeon RX 570 4GB: 2022 Update

Today we're revisiting a mid-range GPU boxing betwixt the Radeon RX 570 4GB and GeForce GTX 1060 3GB. It's been a picayune over a yr since we compared these two head to caput in an all-encompassing 28 game battle, and then we thought it was near fourth dimension to take another look now that GPU prices seem to exist coming back downwardly to more than reasonable prices.

Since the original comparing we've received multiple commuter and game updates equally well as quite a few new games which we've added to the benchmark list. Of the 27 games we'll be testing, but half a dozen of them were featured in last year's battle.

Concluding time the Radeon RX 570 was a mere ii% slower on average, and then a very even fight. Currently the RX 570 costs ~$10 more than the 3GB version of the GTX 1060 -- even though its reference cost is $170, while the GTX 1060 should be about $200. Today though the 1060 starts at $230 while the 570 starts at $240, so similar all graphics cards they were better priced a year ago.

Representing the light-green team is the MSI GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming Ten 3G and for the scarlet team the MSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming 10 4G. Although both models are pretty heavily overclocked out of the box, we're notwithstanding going to squeeze every final scrap of performance from them with a custom overclock.w

Stock the RX 570 Gaming X comes clocked at 1281 MHz for the cadre and 1750 MHz for the GDDR5 retentivity. We were simply able to increase the cadre clock to 1435 MHz, a 12% core overclock and the memory to 1900 MHz, a 9% overclock.

Every bit for the GTX 1060 Gaming X 3G, it comes with a base cadre clock of 1569 MHz for and 2002 MHz for the GDDR5 retention. We were able to hit 1770 MHz for the core and this resulted in a boost frequency of nearly 2150 MHz depending on load. The memory also reached 2275 MHz, so a 13% core overclock and a 14% retention overclock.

As mentioned earlier we have 27 games in total, all of which have been tested at 1080p using both the stock and overclocked configurations. As usual our Corsair GPU examination rig built in the Crystal Series 570X has been used and inside we have an i7-8700K clocked at v GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory. We realize this hardware configuration is overkill for these GPUs, but the thought here is to remove any potential system bottlenecks that might mask GPU throughput. Now let'southward get to the good stuff…

Benchmarks

First up we have the Battleground 1 results and here the GTX 1060 was half dozen% faster out of the box and 11% faster in one case overclocked. So a clear win here for Nvidia but it has to be said the RX 570 nonetheless puts on a prove, delivering well over threescore fps at 1080p using the maximum in-game quality settings.

Unfortunately Nvidia still hasn't addressed their underwhelming Wreckfest functioning, allowing AMD to rear stop them in brutal fashion every bit the RX 570 provides up to 47% more functioning. More critically the RX 560 averaged lx fps out of the box, whereas the GTX 1060 3GB struggled to break the 40 fps bulwark.

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is another title that really favours the red squad, hither the RX 570 beat the GTX 1060 by a 36% margin out of the box though Nvidia was able to reduce that to a 27% margin in favour of the RX 570 once both GPUs were overclocked.

Although Far Cry 5 is an AMD sponsored title we saw little to no bias upon release, both Radeon and GeForce GPUs performed every bit expected. Hither nosotros see the GTX 1060 3GB is slightly faster than the RX 570 out of the box and xi% faster once overclocked.

Fortnite is built upon the Unreal Engine four and therefore has a natural tendency to favour hardware from the greenish team. Here we see the GTX 1060 providing 15% more performance stock and 17% more once overclocked. Still it's worth keeping in listen that we are using the maximum in game quality settings at 1080p and even so seeing well over 60 fps at all times using the RX 570.

Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia is a newly released title that plays well on both AMD and Nvidia hardware. That said the GTX 1060 3GB has a reasonable operation advantage as information technology provided 11% more than frames out of the box and 16% more than once overclocked. Nonetheless at that place was no shortage of frames at 1080p using either GPU.

AMD's ARMA 3 performance has improved out of sight in the past twelvemonth and although the RX 570 was slower than the GTX 1060 3GB, information technology was only vii% slower out of the box and provided well over 60 fps at all times.

The terminal game nosotros're going to await at is Warhammer Vermintide 2 and this is another championship that plays nicely with AMD hardware. Hither the RX 570 spat out lxx fps on average out of the box and that made it xiii% faster than the GTX 1060 3GB.

When it comes to power consumption the RX 570 does suck downwardly a little more than the GTX 1060. It's at a disadvantage hither being that the dice is 16% larger so non that surprising nosotros see a 19% increase in total organization consumption. Even so even when overclocked nosotros're simply seeing a system consumption of 332 watts and that includes a Core i7-8700K clocked at v GHz, so with a lower finish CPU it's unlikely you'll run into full organisation consumption climb higher up 300 watts.

Summary

Now let'south get the full picture by looking at the results beyond all 27 games. Stock out of the box the GTX 1060 3GB was on average 4% faster than the RX 570. Not a big margin, merely it has grown past a few percent since we last compared the ii, and so the 3GB 1060 is still kicking along okay at 1080p.

The 1060 enjoyed solid wins in GTA V, Warhammer II, Assassin'south Creed Origins and Battlefront II. It was less impressive when testing with Wreckfest and Rainbow Six Siege.

Then with both graphics cards overclocked the GTX 1060 3GB extended its lead out to eight% and was now able to deliver considerably more performance in 6 of the titles tested, providing 20% more frames. Loses in titles such as Wreckfest and Rainbow Six Siege were as well reduced. Then if you plan on manually overclocking your graphics card the GTX 1060 is very attractive and considering it consumes less power it also runs a little cooler as well, though temperatures will vary quite a chip from 1 model to the side by side so nosotros won't go into that data here.

Closing Thoughts

So which one of these GPUs should y'all buy? Depending on the games you play, one model might be a amend choice than the other. Overall though the experience was very similar in nearly every title tested. Last time I said there was no right or wrong pick here, they're just too close to telephone call it, and so get whichever is less expensive.

Having said all that, I personally gravitate towards the GTX 1060 3GB for a few reasons. Although I'm not happy about the 3GB naming -- it's not merely a GTX 1060 6GB with half the memory, it's missing an SM unit of measurement taking the CUDA core count from 1280 down to 1152 -- so in spite of having the same name, it actually features ten% fewer cores. Simply that doesn't change the fact that the 3GB 1060 is actually still a really practiced value product.

Right at present the GeForce is also slightly cheaper than the RX 570 while offering slightly better functioning. So if I had a little over $200 to spend on a graphics bill of fare, that's what I'd be getting correct now.

If you tin can afford to pony up the extra $50 or so for the fully fledged 6GB model and so past all means do so, but at 1080p there's no risk you're going to see 20% more than performance, and then in terms of cost per frame the 3GB version offers much more value.

Finally, if you want to take advantage of adaptive sync technology on a budget, then the RX 570 makes more sense as FreeSync is more affordable, but the feel will vary from brandish to display then make certain you lot do your research there.